Efforts to replace physicians are occurring not only in corporations but in academia. The University of Pennsylvania’s radiology department seems to have a particular interest in replacing radiologists with lesser-trained ‘radiology extenders,’ and in 2020, published a study claiming that these assistants outperformed radiology residents in interpreting chest x-rays. (While the article insisted that there were no differences in errors, radiology assistants significantly misread 6 films, including 3 potentially dangerous errors, while radiology residents misread 1 film, not dangerously)

PPP identified numerous problems with the study, including the ethics of using residents without formal IRB review. We sent a letter to the University of Pennsylvania’s Vice-Provost for Research expressing our concern. While denying any wrongdoing in research methodology, the authors did choose to withdraw the article.

PPP Board member and radiologist Phil Shaffer MD and radiologist Sharon D’Souza MD MPH discuss the details of the article and its withdrawal.

You might also be interested in...

  • Our critical appraisal of Cochrane’s “Substitute of Nurses for Physicians in Hospital Settings” is published in Missouri Medicine

    October 1, 2026

  • North Carolina Legal Challenge Threatens Vital Physician-Led Patient Safeguards

    September 25, 2026

  • Why Physician-Led Care and Credential Transparency Are Non-Negotiable Safeguards

    September 17, 2026

  • Profit Over Expertise: NP’s and PA’s Fuel Over-Prescribing Risks. Pharmaceutical Companies Profit & Patients Can be Harmed.

    August 24, 2026