Efforts to replace physicians are occurring not only in corporations but in academia. The University of Pennsylvania’s radiology department seems to have a particular interest in replacing radiologists with lesser-trained ‘radiology extenders,’ and in 2020, published a study claiming that these assistants outperformed radiology residents in interpreting chest x-rays. (While the article insisted that there were no differences in errors, radiology assistants significantly misread 6 films, including 3 potentially dangerous errors, while radiology residents misread 1 film, not dangerously)

PPP identified numerous problems with the study, including the ethics of using residents without formal IRB review. We sent a letter to the University of Pennsylvania’s Vice-Provost for Research expressing our concern. While denying any wrongdoing in research methodology, the authors did choose to withdraw the article.

PPP Board member and radiologist Phil Shaffer MD and radiologist Sharon D’Souza MD MPH discuss the details of the article and its withdrawal.

You might also be interested in...

  • Who Should Supervise Resident Physicians? PPP Calls on ACGME to Strengthen Physician Oversight

    October 20, 2026

  • The Danger of Sensational Journalism: How an Outlier Skewed the Discussion on Physician Supervision Fees

    October 19, 2026

  • New Appraisal Challenges Cochrane Claims That Nurses Can Replace Physicians in Hospital Care

    October 14, 2026

  • Finally: Real Research Examines the Physician-Led Difference in Emergency Department Care

    October 13, 2026